Tagged with Media

The abrasive nature of Facebook’s frictionless sharing

frictionlesssharing

The above is a screengrab from Facebook (with names redacted to avoid further blushing) which highlights the futility of Facebook’s new frictionless sharing system, whereby – if the app is enabled – your viewing habits on certain sites are instantly broadcast to your Facebook friends.

The above incident is fairly self-explanatory but does suggest that users are unaware of just how the new system works and that greater privacy issues lurk beneath the surface. If this non-permission based sharing becomes de rigeur for the social web, viewing habits will change drastically and see a wave of NSFW derivations spread across content headlines:

  • Not Safe For Family
  • Not Safe for Significant Other
  • Not Safe for Parents etc.

Browsing on the web is still – at least to your curated public audience – a largely anonymous activity. Sure, the service providers, data warehouses and Ad servers know what you are doing but your friends and family don’t and nor should they need to, within the bounds of taste, decency and legality.

Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

“Social Media Predictions for 2011″ via @paulfabretti

These crystal ball assumptions seem to fit in with the collective thoughts of the “social” crowd (No doubt it made for a great talk too). Along with a maturity and evolution of social, it is looking like it will be a year where cross platform integration is on the up and the adoption of social will infiltrate further areas and become a very natural fit. Plenty of opportunities and an abundance of data and insight to be had too.

Which are you expecting to have the greatest impact? Please do share your forecasts.

Tagged , , , , ,

On the 12 Days of Christmas poorly targeted marketing delivered to me…

A Cheryl Cole video bundle, Father Ted Christmas special, Duran Duran EP, Fishing Kings game, Life of Pi novel, Michael Buble EP, Charlie Chaplin movie and fiiiiiiiiiive more unexciting things.

If you are an iPhone or iPod Touch user then you will be familiar with the aforementioned list as you may have downloaded the ‘12 Days of Christmas’ application and received a daily text revealing the latest free offering from iTunes. I’m not staring down the molar barrel of a gift horse here, the Father Ted episode was great but if there is one thing that iTunes means to me, is the personalised experience that I create within it. Like it or not, (and long before the socialification of iTunes via Ping) you have a relationship with iTunes, you put in the content you like and download the stuff that you find appealing to your tastes, be this books, apps, films or games. The ‘i’ in ‘iTunes’ might as well stand for idiosyncratic.  No two iTunes libraries will be the same.

What does this mean? It means that the profile and persona you create is a valuable pool of data for Apple themselves. They already have the Genius feature that runs a recommendation algorithm based on your tastes and so we know they work with what you have got to enhance your media collection. If you want the science behind it all, I suggest you read this excellent post on TechnologyReview.com

So why get uptight about the 12 Days of Christmas offerings? Well, if the thinly veiled intention is to get you accustomed to the range of media available and the ease with which it can be downloaded and enjoyed on a device, would it not be of more benefit to both parties if content was supplied that tallied with a user’s existing media choices within their iTunes library? Of course you will be hard pushed to please everyone all the time but even if iTunes segmented customers into four categories across each line of media (video, podcast, music, games, books) it would undoubtedly yield a higher rate of customers making future purchases.                

I like podcasts, iTunes knows this, why not use that information to suggest a new podcast for me to enjoy based on the existing knowledge of podcasts I have downloaded? You know that I have a preferred style of music that I enjoy so why offer me Cheryl Cole?

iTunes didn’t even have to work hard to collect such data, it was freely volunteered, why not use it better and keenly target their offering. Let me know if you experienced similar poorly aimed marketing campaigns. Is this wasted budget?

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

Social networks are delivering television viewers, not taking away.

I nearly missed the ‘Enter’ button on my netbook when I was tweeting and watching Hollyoaks and read happened upon this article from the Guradian’s media section feed.

“TV viewing up despite social networking”

The article explains how the worries of experts within the TV industry that social networking would take viewers away from TV had not been realised on the back of findings released by OFCOM today.

The Guardian reports that the OFCOM findings show “Viewers watched an average of three hours and 45 minutes of television a day in 2009, 3% more than in 2004″

For me, this seems a ludicrous and narrow-minded vision of what social can do for television. There is nothing better and more sociable than watching a TV programme and tweeting along with your followers and with a wider audience when using a hashtag too.

#dragonsden #bgt #queenofshops #worldcup #JuniorApprentice #Wimbledon #BB11 #Sherlock are just a few programmes that have a committed audience that consume the broadcast and share their insight, disgust, quips or snide comments with others in near real time on Twitter.

From my own  experience, I know that tweeting along to television can be a valuable experience and above all a social and enjoyable one too.

I wouldn’t miss #XFactor for anything when I know @Popjustice @Charltonbrooker or @Crablin are going to be watching with me and passing comment and adding to the dialogue of countless others.

TV has always been an inherently social activity but with a delay. The office buzz the morning after a particularly eventful episode of any given soap has always been labelled as ‘water-cooler chat’ – Twitter just cuts down the lag-time. The challenge for those that make programmes is to fight for viewers’ attention in an ever reduced attention span market, if you will.

Integrating social into television hardware is already here but not widely available and therefore not widely used. Im not sure if this level of functionality is something I would want from my TV set, I am happy enough with the near surgical attachment of my iPhone and netbook for now thanks.

Bookmark and Share

Tagged , , , , ,

BBC Jonathan Creek budget cuts leaked same day as Alan Davies book release-coincidence?

It doesn’t take Jonathan Creek to work out that the clumsy sleight of hand at work here was not that of Houdini, no the Harry who done it is in fact PR.

On the day that Alan Davies released his book ‘My Favourite People and Me 1978-1988,’ a collective of musings published by Michael Joseph, a prominently placed article about our tousled locks hero appeared on the BBC news homepage.

The story in question relates to the subtle slip of the tweet made by @alandavies1 that in order to pursue his role as JC he would be stomaching a 25% pay cut. Timing is everything, national press picks up on the story and voilà…coverage, a raised profile, book sales and much more…

It came to my attention yesterday that Alan Davies would be in Bristol come October as part of the fantastic Autumn programme put on by the Bristol Festival of Ideas. Perhaps I could discuss the PR strategy with the man himself or maybe his publishers could supply me with a copy of his book in advance of the event so I can ask him something, well, something Quite Interesting.

Bookmark and Share

Tagged , , , , , , ,

Harnessing the power of hyper-critical social consumers

The power of bloggers when it comes to consumer issues is widely documented. Single posts, even as little as 140 characters, can bring companies to their knees. To be at the mercy of those with an internet connection is daunting when you’re a product, brand or organisation. Last week saw Dominos have to go into reactive PR overdrive after a video made by two employees adding their own unique toppings, received several hits in no time at all. Amazon found itself on the receiving end of accusations of homophobia for its (mis)categorisation of literature.

As blogger, Stella Duffy points out, ‘Amazon’s ‘glitch’ equates LGBT sexuality with porn with adult material.’ Amazon themselves put it down to an “embarrassing and ham-fisted cataloguing error” which saw 57,310 listings banned from their catalogue for a temporary stretch.

Consumer complaints ‘going viral’ can be a plague like spread that represents the ultimate nightmare for companies. It is often said in politics that if you don’t kill a story in 24 hours then things must be REALLY bad.

It is how you react to these instances that can make or break a reputation. For example, when EA Sports released their latest Tiger Woods golf simulator game there was a bug found by many gmae players which saw players able to walk on water – a basic graphical error, a simple misjudged code -but this was enough to irk ardent gameplayers. How did EA react? They went viral. They produced a video of Tiger Woods walking on water and playing the seeming unplayable water shot. 3,052,876 views later and voila…everyone is happy.

What about when companies, in their quest to target a market, take on social networking from the off. Harnessing the power of Twitter, YouTube, Facebook and more by offering the product for free, upfront and letting those internet types get full free use of the product in order that (hopefully) they write positive things about the product in question and we all rush out and buy one because we know that the internet approves.

In this instance, Ford are taking a risk by allowing the most hypercritical and brutally honest consumers of all, those who blog, have a say on a product which costs a fiver shy of ten thousand pounds and is aimed at the twentysomething market. The new Ford Fiesta, as heavily advertised in the television advert of the car driving through a slick urban landscape in all its ‘Hot Magenta’ glory sound tracked by Pluxus and their song ‘Transient.’ 100 cars have been loaned out to young internet using drivers and they have been asked to report back to the online world their honest feelings, thoughts and experiences of the vehicle.

Not just a savvy way of advertising the car in it current form, Scott Monty, Global Digital Communications bigwig for Ford Motor Company comments:

“Let’s not forget that this is a full year before the car even goes on sale in the U.S. That means that the feedback we get (we’ll also be doing regular surveys, polls and interviews) will be shared with the engineering/design team to further improve the car for the U.S. Market.”

However, as LitmanLive.co.uk writes, social media marketing opportunities are not the reserve of the young:

“Most interactive marketers know that young consumers are very engaged in social media, but many fail to appreciate that the same social tools can also be used to reach older users. Recent Forrester research shows there are a significant number of European baby boomers – adults aged 43-63 – who already read social media on a regular basis, and another, slightly smaller subset who are already uploading their own content, like videos, onto the web. Marketers can take advantage of this by offering them value with useful information and support provided in a social context.”

The public are not the enemy of those with products to sell and targets to meet and should a company drop the ball then the online world will certainly hear about it. It is how companies harness the new hypercritical consumer audience and their penchant for filming themselves, Twittering and blogging that will alter the commercial landscape.

Tagged , , , ,

B&NES Council to webcast democracy?

++Updated++

B&NES (Bath and North East Somerset) Council have agreed to, ‘Examine the options for the remote access to Council meetings. This will provide the opportunity for people who are unable to attend a meeting to view and contribute to key local issues and decisions.’

The decision was made during the recent Safer and Stronger Communities Overview & Scrutiny Panel meeting and will mean that members of the public can view live meetings from a computer in their own home. The decision comes as part of an extensive ‘Review of Community Empowerment’ which examined means and ways of opening up the workings of Council to improve the flow of information with the public in a more meaningful and democratic manner.

The Communications team will examine the options for remote access. This will involve evaluating the Council website as one means of broadcasting information. A similar facility is well established by Bristol City Council. For the past 18 months webcasts of meetings have been viewed by the public in efforts to open up the workings of Council to a wider audience.

The Bristol City Council website explains that the 2-year pilot, supported by the EU’s e-Participate project, ‘webcasts a range of meetings to improve public access to our democratic processes, and to be more accountable to the citizens of Bristol.’

++Update++

Bristol City Council’s Information & Development Officer, Daniel Kemp, has supplied me with some further information regarding the effective deployment of such technology in Bristol.

“Our webcasting pilot began in 2007 and finishes in September this year. We regularly get an audience of over 150 live viewers for important meetings such as Full Council, and archive viewings of our meetings can range from 200 to over 1,000.”

“Our biggest live audience was 1,143 people who tuned in to see the debate on the Memorial Stadium proposals in April last year. We’ve noticed a reduction in the number of people who turn up to public meetings now the facility is available to view it from home or the office.”

Daniel explains how survey findings have indicated that the introduction of Webcasting has been well received by councillors, officers and the public alike. In their survey, conducted January 2009, 60% of people found it easy to access webcasts online. 76% of respondents agreed that webcasting made the council more open and accountable, and 89% are likely to watch future webcasts of the council.

Daniel Kemp adds: “We are very likely to continue webcasting after the pilot ends, dependent on securing funding for the project.”

The evidence is clear that it has added a much needed modernisation to the system, but as with everything, it is subject to funding. With purse strings ever tightening, is it a Council service that could be one of the first to be cut?

:: Article appeared in ‘The Week in’ newspaper 9th April, 2009.

Tagged , , , , , ,